| |
Article
Overview: This article discusses the merits of a centralised
staff exit interview survey process. Exit Interview surveys are a crucial tactic
for any company serious about understanding the reasons behind unwanted departures
and retaining their existing staff. A centralised Exit Interview survey process
can help remove interviewer bias, improve consistency and deliver a centralised
reporting platform.
| |
|
| |
Key Takeouts:
- There is a growing
trend within organisations to centralise their staff exit interview process.
- Potential
gains from a centralised approach can include the reduction of interviewer bias,
greater consistency in methodology, and better quality organisation or department-wide
reporting.
- A well executed exit
interview process can provide invaluable insight, improve employee retention levels,
and should be a mandatory consideration for any employer serious about improving
employee satisfaction levels.
| |
| Human
resource departments typically conduct exit interview surveys to gather information
from departing employees to help the company improve working conditions, retain
existing employees and identify problem areas within the organisation.
One
of the great aspects of exit interviews is that the departing employee often feels
less concerned about the ramifications of 'treading on toes' and hence is typically
willing to provide extremely open and honest feedback about their reasons for
leaving and their thoughts about what the company could do to improve.
However,
while exit interviews clearly have their place and are a vital tactic for any
organisation serious about retaining their staff, there are many pitfalls to avoid.
Some of the key challenges that companies face in conducting exit interviews include: 1.
Interviewer bias: The person charged with asking the questions may not be
100% impartial or may have negative preconceived notions about the departing employee.
2.
Interpretation: Often, the departing employee says 'X', yet the interviewer
writes down 'Y'. They hear what they want to hear and record what they want to
record.
3. Data entry: Often
the person responsible for interviewing the departing employee is at Management
level, and places a low priority on data entering the results of the exit interview
into a centralised system that authorised Managers can access.
4.
Reporting: As notes are typically hand written, there is not one central place
where all exit interview data is stored. The data also needs to be held on secured
servers (as the information is often sensitive) and results accessible to only
those with appropriate privileges.
5.
Consistency: Without a standard exit interview questionnaire, the questions
asked and information collected can vary wildly.
6.
Confronting: The departing employee can sometimes feel as if it's too confronting
to provide open and honest feedback face-to-face, especially if the interviewer
is personally known to the employee or if the interviewer has a good working relationship
with the departing employee's Manager.
7.
Timing: If the departing employee leaves the organisation suddenly, the task
of conducting the exit interview is often overlooked. However, employees departing
in this manner still have valuable information and feedback to contribute.
So,
what can be done to help minimise these pitfalls?
The
trend towards a centralised Exit Interview process.
Today
many companies are turning towards a centralised exit interview process - in many
cases performed with the help of online tools. In simple terms, once an employee
leaves the organisation (or in the final weeks of their tenure) the following
steps occur: 1. HR is notified
of the departing employee's name / last day of work. 2.
HR e-mail the departing employee a link to a structured online exit interview
survey, and ask that they complete it at a time that suits them over the next
1-2 weeks maximum. The survey form is pre-coded with the employee's name, their
division, their Manager's name, and their location so that HR can easily report
and filter results by this information. 3.
As soon as the survey has been completed, HR is notified by e-mail, AND, the survey
results are automatically entered into an online database where reports can be
run and charts produced. 4. (Optional)
- HR can phone the departing employee if any matters raised in their feedback
survey require further investigation, or if the employee has indicated a desire
to discuss any comments further. Just because the initial information gathering
is done online for consistency, it doesn't mean that the person touch is lost. 5.
(Optional) - HR can then invite the departing employee's Manager or the 'Next
Up' Manager to review the feedback and add any further comments into a separate
section of the same survey (this section cannot be viewed by the departing employee). 6.
HR then log online and run date-defined reports to review cumulative exit interview
results, spot trends, and measure the change in ratings over time for the whole
company, or broken down by department or location. Key areas of weakness are spotted
and an action plan to address developed.
When
we map this online process against the traditional problem areas of decentralised
exit interviews highlighted above, we find it addresses many of the challenges
faced: - Interviewer
bias: Problem removed - the interview
is in the form of an online survey.
-
Interpretation errors: Problem removed
- what the departing employee types is exactly what HR report on.
-
Data entry: Problem removed - the online
survey stores the exact data and ratings entered by the departing employee. Management's
data entry requirement is removed.
-
Reporting access: Problem removed - anyone
given authorisation can access the results from any web browser in the World,
at any time, with the data securely held on encrypted servers.
-
Consistency: Problem removed - the exit
interview survey issued is the same for all employees.
-
Confronting: Problem removed - the departing
employee can complete the survey in their own time, at their own pace, without
feeling like they need to sugar coat the tone or nature of their comments to meet
the expectations of the interviewer.
-
Quick Departures: Problem removed - if an employee departs suddenly, the
survey can still easily be sent and administered remotely in the days or weeks
following the departure.
In
short, a well executed exit interview process can provide invaluable insight,
improve employee retention levels, and should be a mandatory consideration for
any employer serious about improving employee satisfaction levels. In many cases
the trends towards the centralisation of this exit process can produce clear improvements
in reducing the inherent inefficiencies of a decentralised, one-on-one process.
| |
About Regent Recruitment
Regent Recruitment is a recruitment consultancy that assists leading Australian
employers to attract and retain talented staff on a contract, temporary or permanent
basis. Whether we are filling one permanent role or recruiting contract staff
for a 400-seat call centre, we deliver an exceptional recruitment service.
Unlike other recruitment consultancies, Regent
Recruitment is unique in that it combines the capabilities of a large-scale multinational
recruitment operation with exceptional service levels typically only associated
with small boutique agencies. How
can we assist you? We would welcome the opportunity to have a confidential
meeting to discuss your staffing needs in more detail. If
you are interested, in the first instance please call Howard Mereine, General
Manager, on (03) 9909 7150 or e-mail Howard at hmereine@regentrecruitment.com.au. We
look forward to speaking with you.
| | |
This article was licenced by Regent Recruitment for the Regent
Recruitment client newsletter.
Written by Paul Quinn, Director of PeoplePulse.com.au.
Subscriptions
Please
feel free to forward this listing on to other people in your company or in the
wider industry who you believe may benefit. You may subscribe or unsubscribe
at any time - click
here to manage your subscription.
Disclaimer
The
views and opinions expressed in this document are those of the authors and do
not necessarily reflect the view of Regent Personnel Pty Ltd.
|