Return To Our Website
|
Article Archive
|
Subscription Manager
|
Refer a Friend
 
 
Overview: Ideally, work/life balance programs support diversity and are effective recruitment and retention tools. Trouble is, many companies don't deliver.

 

 


Takeouts:

  • Work-life strategies have not just hit the corporate mainstream - they have become a driver toward competitive advantage in an ever tightening employment market.
  • Even the most progressive approach to work-life strategies will fail without strong commitment from management and a culture that accepts and supports the fact that there's more to life than work.
  • Not implementing work-life strategies can add significant additional costs in staff turnover, occupational health and safety and general performance levels.

 


In just a few short years, work/life balance has moved from a management buzzword to one of the major human resource issues of the early 21st century. To maintain a competitive advantage, businesses will need to work harder to attract and retain quality staff. Australia's ageing population is already creating a critical skills shortage in many industries that will only deepen as the baby boomer generation reaches retirement. Changing demographics within the employment market - including greater numbers of working mothers, mature workers and certain minority groups - is forcing companies to deliver family-friendly strategies and offer flexible conditions for an increasingly diverse workforce.

Despite the attention given to the creation of work/life programs by many organisations in recent years, the majority of employees today are still failing to reap the benefits of a balanced professional and personal life[1]. Many work/life programs currently lack true business grounding, are frequently at odds with corporate culture, and are often viewed by employees as add-ons and concessions targeted primarily at women.

Defining the Balance

The concept of work/life balance has shifted significantly in recent times. Originally, 'balance' meant devoting equal time to paid and unpaid roles, with a particular emphasis on family. Recent studies have expanded the meaning to include the level of satisfaction with and psychological commitment to work and non-work roles[2]. This broader understanding of 'balance' now incorporates aspects such as study, volunteering, exercise or the significant increase in more senior workers involved in 'eldercare'[3].

What is clear is that the absence of balance tends to create conflict between work and non-work roles, where staff are unable to adequately fulfil their commitments in either or both spheres. When unresolved, this conflict leads to lower productivity and commitment, absenteeism and resignation. To minimise this conflict, many companies are now offering benefits and programs under the three broad categories of flexible work, specialised leave and dependant care benefits[4]. However, many of the underlying cultural issues are still not very well addressed , resulting in numerous programs not achieving their desired objectives.

Why Do Work/Life Balance Programs Fail to Deliver?

(i) Leadership and Corporate Culture

A successful work/life strategy requires the commitment of senior executives, which then cascades through the organisation to all levels of management. Those at the top must be aware of and accept the importance of family issues and demonstrate strong support for work/life programs.

A lack of managerial support often undermines work/life programs by discouraging employees' efforts to balance their lives. Supervisors can send negative signals to their employees around the use of flexible benefits, or fail to model appropriate balance in their own lives, thus setting a default cultural standard which is not family-friendly.

The challenge in moving the work/life balance issue from rhetoric to reality is one of leadership. Renewed commitment and courage on the part of business leaders is required to consciously create organisational cultures which embody new values. These cultures are the key to keeping and motivating a productive, multi-skilled workforce.

Companies that truly entrench the initiatives into their culture typically integrate family support into the business itself. At Hewlett Packard, for example, every business unit's annual review must identify work/life issues and develop action plans[6]. One outcome of this initiative was that financial managers developed activity rescheduling and 'work from home' IT support to overcome peak period bottlenecks.

(ii) Perceived Career Disadvantages

Many organisations today offer programs like part-time work, flexitime and telecommuting, but often the corporate culture identifies those that utilise such programs as less committed to their job. If there is a general perception among staff that working long hours is essential for career advancement, and that visibility equals productivity, this can undermine attempts to promote work/life balance.

Employees who adopt flexible work practices can sometimes be seen as lacking in ambition or commitment and overlooked for promotion. If a person indicates a desire for a part-time job, he or she may be viewed as no longer interested in professional growth and opportunity. Some staff who use flexible arrangements have reportedly experienced 'family-friendly backlash' or resentment from co-workers.

(iii) 'One Size' Fits All

Historically, work/life programs have revolved around flexible working conditions for women, with part-time work, maternity leave, job sharing and shorter working days increasingly common. The uptake of alternative work options by men has tended to be extremely low. This is due in part to organisational pressure and the traditional expectation in both the business world and wider community that men are the main breadwinners of the family unit.

For business with substantial numbers of administrative, maintenance or customer-facing employees, offering flexible working conditions can be problematic. Where the hours of work are customer-driven, organisations face limitations on flexibility for employees, but this is when family-friendly programs such as child care would be of most benefit. Sydney's Star City Casino's 24 hour child care centre is one notable positive example. The facility is directly credited with contributing to the lowest staff turnover rate of any casino in Australia[7].

It must also be noted that not everyone wants work/life balance. Some employees state that they are happy to work long hours and take fewer holidays, believing this will fast-track their career advancement[8]. Furthermore, according to a 2004 Harris Interactive survey, at least 30% of employed adults give up holiday time they have earned[9]

(iv) Return on Investment

A critical element in implementing a work/life strategy is to objectively highlight the impact of a people-friendly work environment on profits. However, measuring the return on investment in work/life programs can be difficult.

There are two areas where work/life programs can positively impact the bottom line:

1. Affect on recruitment and retention:

Staff turnover is a major issue for many businesses because of the costs of hiring and training new personnel, as well as the resulting loss of intellectual capital and customer defections. Ernst & Young estimate the cost of turnover in client service roles averages 150% of a departing employee's annual salary
[10].

The provision of flexible work options can result in a substantial reduction in staff turnover. In 1999, when Westpac introduced six week maternity leave for the first time, resignations while on leave dropped from 40.6% to 17.9%[11]. When both employers and employees see work/life balance as a priority, people are more likely to commit and stay with the organisation.

2. Impact on productivity and commitment:

The provision of work/life programs may also benefit profitability indirectly by increasing worker productivity. High levels of job satisfaction often results in less absenteeism and greater levels of commitment. A US survey has demonstrated the strong relationship between employee commitment and return to shareholders, finding that companies with highly committed employees achieved a 112% return to shareholders over three years, compared with a 76% return for companies with low employee commitment
[12].

Conclusion

The need to provide flexible work options has never been greater, and will become a critical challenge for Australian business in the future. A shrinking and increasingly diverse workforce will drive employers of choice to be more family-friendly so that employees can achieve greater balance between their personal and professional lives. But even the most progressive approach will fail without strong commitment from management, a culture that supports a family-friendly environment, and recognition of the positive impact that flexibility can have on a company's bottom line. Only when these barriers are removed will the promised work/life balance become reality for Australian workers.


References:

[9] Lost Time: Vacation Days Go Unused Despite More Liberal Time-Off Policies
http://www.workforce.com/archive/feature/23/89/82/index.php

[11] The Baby or the Briefcase, SMH - click here.

[12] WorkUSA, (2000), Employee Commitment and the Bottom Line, Research Report, http://www.watsonwyatt.com/research/resrender.asp?id+W-304&page=1

Other Resources:
Work/Life Balance: An Issue of Leadership - http://flexibility.com.au/newsletter-issue3.html#4

 
About Regent Recruitment

Regent Recruitment is a recruitment consultancy that assists leading Australian employers to attract and retain talented staff on a contract, temporary or permanent basis. Whether we are filling one permanent role or recruiting contract staff for a 400-seat call centre, we deliver an exceptional recruitment service.

Unlike other recruitment consultancies, Regent Recruitment is unique in that it combines the capabilities of a large-scale multinational recruitment operation with exceptional service levels typically only associated with small boutique agencies.

How can we assist you?

We would welcome the opportunity to have a confidential meeting to discuss your staffing needs in more detail.

If you are interested, in the first instance please call Howard Mereine, General Manager, on (03) 9909 7150 or e-mail Howard at hmereine@regentrecruitment.com.au.

We look forward to speaking with you.

 

This article was licenced by Regent Recruitment for the Regent Recruitment client newsletter.
Written by Victoria Small, and edited by Paul Quinn, Quinntessential Marketing Consulting Pty Ltd.


Subscriptions

Please feel free to forward this listing on to other people in your company or in the wider industry who you believe may benefit.

You may subscribe or unsubscribe at any time - click here to manage your subscription.


Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of Regent Personnel Pty Ltd.


Regent Recruitment © 2004-2005 l General Privacy Policy l Collection Statement